Golf Committee Chair agrees with assessment increase; committee formed Revenue Sub-committee; short-game challenge June 7
Jamin Townsen, Chair of the Hot Springs Village Golf Committee, presented a committee update at the May 19, 2021 Board Meeting.
Townsen said, “the Golf Committee has formed a new Revenue Sub-committee to determine if there are any areas in the Golf Department fee structure to improve cash flow.”
Some things being looked at in this area could affect some of the people that we probably want to protect most – older folks that live here.
Townsen stated, “I am not sure how much we can improve it, but we’re going to take a look at it. Obviously, a lot of that goes away if we able to increase the monthly POA fee, which I think we are working towards and I think that is a good idea, personally.”
Townsen said they worked with the Golf Department to approve new course standards in the “post-COVID environment.”
Currently, the Golf Committee is working with the Rotary Club to put together a short-game skill challenge. This will be held at Magellan on June 7, 2021.
Finally, “a drainage issue was identified in front of the 12th forward tee on Ponce and the concern was brought to our attention by an adopt-a-hole volunteer. The matter was presented to the course superintendent and it was roped off to prevent carts from getting stuck in that area.”
There were no questions from the Board Members.
Reported by Cheryl Dowden, May 21, 2021
* * *
Thank you for reading. If you like, please comment below. We love to hear your opinion, but comments must be made using your first and last real name, or they will not be accepted. If you would like to submit an article for publication, please contact us through this website. Be sure to bookmark this website. Click here to visit the Hot Springs Village People Facebook Group, also known as POG (Property Owners’ Group).
Lynda Narug
05/21/2021 — 12:21 pm
Is anybody actually interested in protecting the seniors who have lived in HSV for years or just how much assessments can be raised. Its’ all about the money, more is never enough. There’s always a new “must have”, now its the Balboa Club. It was neglected for decades, yet had good possibilities for its use. The various service clubs considered using it for their meetings, but could not afford the cost. So it’s sat rotting away for years, until the cost to rehab it becomes ultra expensive. If the assessments were raised again, how long would that satisfy their “needs” instead of “must haves”?
Jackie Patton
05/21/2021 — 2:10 pm
For those of us who have not lived here “for years”, it seems that the past assessments were insufficient to cover everything that is here. Now, every time there is a need for money to either maintain or improve, it is someone else’s responsibility to pay for it. We all live here and we all should support what we have here.
Tom Blakeman
05/21/2021 — 2:14 pm
A total contradiction in terms. First the committee wants to change the golf fee structure to improve cash flow. But, they want to somehow protect the “older folks that live here.” Not to worry though, if we just increase the POA assessments all is OK.
Bullshit.
Rosanne Hitch
05/21/2021 — 3:28 pm
Totally agree! That told us a bunch of nothing except if we raise fees it will be okay! BS IS RIGHT!
Susan Posner
05/22/2021 — 12:58 am
Not all live here lot are just empty lot owners, timeshare, vacation condos, no there was money to maintain, some lull in new construction, no boards decided to not use money for maintenance and spend it on unnecessary high salaried positions, 1/2 mil for a map and slides shows, mil for a poorly constructed new pool, pickle-ball courts that didn’t hold up in short time, mil a year over marketing agency vs good advertising, unnecessary trips by management, handing irreclaimable money over to failed deals, high priced external golf management company atop our paid supervisors that charged outrageous for fertilizer, mowers etc., external voting outfit rather than in house, lawsuits over poor decisions…and that’s around time doubled assessments too. So no it was all about mismanaging money in a shell game. Listening to ones who lived here longer is a wise and common sense thing to do, things aren’t always noticeable on surface. Excess of one amenity , was a poor development decision, not sustainable as usage declined as times changed and detrimental to the rest of the place in future. 2 tier assessment, lots(empty no building commitment no resident)vs built( homes and residents) ruined a lot. Garland original older side less golf, lakes and amenities should have been separate HOA assessment while the later Saline newer more golf, lakes, amenities should been a POA (under same HSV umbrella, way its done in other states) Just take a drive between the two and see the huge difference and wonder why there seems to be a imbalance in assessing. Amenities are separate usage charges and are public non owner accessible(owners get a discount). Could charge cart trail fee, and boat dock access fee as other lake golf places do. Charge for everything else, might want to consider public visitor pass entry fee online printable ticket to amenity/event (not a residents guest called in) like owners/contractors are charged for decals to enter. Public non resident does wear and tear on roads, lakes, common property and amenities…There are also grants out there for things like clean up, green energy and such that can be applied for. Really need Balboa club nah you got enough of those plus restaurants and pubs, turn spot into more parking for driving range. Drainage well we’ve had and probably will see more heavy spring rain events, this year 16 inches of unusual snow and will make drainage issues on courses, especially Balboa was built on low swampy land to begin with, don’t drive carts on saturated course greens and if you drive cart into the course ponds you should pay to have it removed. Shortening a few courses could yield a few more golf lots to build on if you approach CCI developer on that or add some landscaped perimeter green spaces for appeal and less land maintenance. Steep banks on DeSoto where energy company sprays saplings we can’t mow, turns brown, well red clover and shorter wildflower seeding, we could get a resident chip into fund perhaps for that. Lot of things to consider than high assessments to supplement type of amenity. Consider inflation and services other than association have increased far more than average senior incomes, not many retirees with great pensions now. Arkansas as is most south retirement (even Florida has old not newer developing and more of a Disney/Universal playground) isn’t about luxury retirement except east/west coastal or wealthy executives, the appeal is cost of living. Average retiring in place or downsizing/moving more and traveling more with their time, age related illnesses, those will affect preexisting communities. Different lifestyles, shrunken middle class, and trends of all ages change, trends aren’t limited to just HSV it goes nationally. It’s only the present and the not too far future with stress of rapid adaptation occurring. Nostalgia is a memory, can’t return to past, time is not our friend. And my last post and wish all better days.