By Tucker Omohundro, January 16, 2020
My name is Tucker Omohundro. I am running for the HSV POA Board.
Before deciding whether to trust me with your vote, it is important to understand what I think and believe regarding Hot Springs Village. So, here are my viewpoints – based on 20+ years of experience personally helping create this community we call home.
But before answering the question “who is Tucker?” here is some critical background on the original purpose of the Hot Springs Village POA, and what it has since become.
Hot Springs Village was built for Retirees
John Cooper started building retirement communities in the 1960s. Although none of his communities were age-restricted, the majority of those who bought into them were retirees.
Since, he built his communities in the middle of nowhere, the locations were perfect for retirees. This was the case for Hot Springs Village – and that’s why he never marketed to 30 or 40-year-olds. HSV was created for people who had already made their living, and no longer had to work to support themselves. There were simply not enough employment opportunities in or near Cooper’s communities to sustain younger, working residents.
Today we are debating over whether HSV is a retirement community. That is exactly what it was – and what it is… there is no debate needed.
Let’s Get the POA Back to Its Original Purpose!
Developer John Cooper established a Property Owners’ Association (POA) in each of his communities. These POA’s were created for administrative purposes, and to maintain the infrastructure. That has always been the purpose of the POA It was formed to manage the assessments collected, and to take care of the infrastructure. That is dramatically different than the role we are seeing today.
We need to get the POA back to what it was designed to do; and that design did not include Presidents, CEOs, CFOs, and the top-heavy staff in place today. We have simply lost sight of the purpose of the POA.
I Raised My Children in Hot Springs Village
At the time I made the choice to work for John Cooper, it meant bringing my family to Hot Springs Village, where the options for my children were few. But I didn’t expect Cooper to build swimming pools or theme parks simply because my children were here. I knew this was a retirement community. The kids were happy and fine. The Village was safe. And the area was absolutely beautiful with many recreational opportunities inside and outside of the gates.
This was – and is – my home; and my family is better for that.
Take Care of the Village FIRST!
POA management should not be concerned with developing lodges or any other amenities. Those decisions need to rest with the elected Board. The staff’s job is to take care of the administration and maintain the Village.
Let me say that again – The staff’s job is to take care of the administration and maintain the Village, it does NOT include community development.
The POA’s responsibility is to maintain the golf courses, streets, community- owned buildings, water, waste, current amenities like tennis courts, trails, etc., and all the other infrastructure – most of which were handed to us from the developer. And the buildings housing our POA staff should probably be called ‘Maintenance and Administration’ offices – because that is what the POA is, and where our focus should be.
HSV is NOT The Villages in Florida
Some people compare Hot Springs Village with The Villages in Florida. Although The Villages also draws retirees, it is an entirely different style of community; a for-profit organization, not a POA. In The Villages over 120,000 people reside on basically the same amount of land that 15,000 of us consider as our home. And, how they pay for their community (including how much) differs dramatically from what we pay here.
Simply put, there is no 100% comparison to Hot Springs Village and another retirement community across the U.S. There are many different types of retirement communities, some standard, some unique. Hot Springs Village is unique and was built to be that way; residents have loved its uniqueness and affordability for 50-years! The organizational structure and decisions of the POA over the last several years has caused a rift in that low. Let’s go back to HSV residents loving where they live and what we have here vs. trying to change HSV into something it should not be nor could it sustain.
We Don’t Need to Change It; We Need to Maintain It!
Most everyone moved to Hot Springs Village knowing the amenities were already in place – not what was envisioned down the road. For all practical purposes, we have added very little to those amenities over the last 15 years — except for the Pickleball Courts, and some additional trails. But that’s OK – because what we have is what Villagers wanted then and still want now.
When we did add an amenity, (such as those Pickleball Courts), it was not done to increase the population; but rather to provide an additional amenity current Villagers wanted and use daily. That model has served us well.
Tomorrow’s residents will come to HSV for its existing facilities. There is no need to add a lodge, town centers, or a new golf course. We don’t need to add buildings and parks. We simply need to concentrate on maintaining what we have… and do that well, within clear cost centers – with amenity-based Profit & Loss accounting – and within set budgets.
Should we ever add new amenities? Certainly. But only when we have surplus funds, and then only when we are serving a majority of the community.
Of course, we also need to accept that dollars spent on amenities will not raise our property values. That will only result from the dollars we spend on effectively marketing Hot Springs Village to the outside world.
Stop the Waste!
We are not a government, with a seemingly endless supply of money. And, a line of credit is not a reserve fund. We need to stop wasting money on real estate offices and development plans, etc. And we are not a developer, nor will we ever be. The recent gate debacle is simply one more example of how we have mismanaged our funds.
Although our current leadership and POA have made it tremendously complicated, our situation is really quite simple… Maintain what we have, for those who want to be here.
How Should We Market Hot Springs Village?
Attracting potential Villagers and visitors is important. We need a marketing plan that works. With today’s technology, we should be able to accomplish that.
Will it totally fix our problem? Perhaps not. But it has to be done; and it needs to be done at the direction of the Board of Directors – rather than within the POA.
Marketing should not fall to the POA. That is a development task; not administration and maintenance. It needs to stand on its own.
As our Developer, John Cooper directed all HSV’s marketing. We are now in a position that we need to tackle that task all over again. The only way that marketing effort will work is totally separate from the POA.
Concentrate Marketing Efforts for the Highest Return
HSV’s marketing focus should be concentrated on where we get the biggest bang for our buck. That ‘pot of gold’ is our current and future retirees. That was John Cooper’s strategy, and it needs to be ours!
This is still ‘Jessieville / Fountain Lake, Arkansas’ – with limited employment opportunities – and moderately paying jobs in the local business community, or in maintaining our infrastructure. There is no thriving industry here or within a 20-mile radius… therefore, HSV is not an easy place to thrive for a younger, working person. Retirees are the answer.
That’s not to say that we don’t welcome younger residents – particularly in a world where ‘working from home’ is an option. We do! HSV has never been age restricted nor should it ever be; but the simple fact is retirees flourish here. And, since we only have so many marketing dollars, we need to concentrate on where we will get the highest return – retirees.
Hot Springs Village is North America’s Largest Gated Community
I retired in Hot Springs Village because of what was already here, inside of our gates. How many times have we heard that HSV is the largest gated community in the United States? Those gates are a big selling point.
There was a time when passing through our gates required you to be a guest of a property owner, a recognized worker, or someone with a qualified purpose. The gates meant something – HSV was not open to the public. That’s not the case today – If you currently approach the gates, the simple phrase “I am on my way to a garage sale,” will get you in, no questions asked. And if you come up to the gates proclaiming, “I am here to play golf or swim in a lake,” the Village is yours!
Of course, we will never be airtight. People will always have valid reasons to enter HSV – such as church, dining in our restaurants, visiting a property owner, or maintaining what we have and resident services like heat & air, plumbing, etc. But there needs to be better procedures to vet those visitors.
Property Owners made the decisions to purchase lots and homes here because of HSV’s gates and security. Today’s ‘casual’ gate policy needs to stop.
It Is Very Simple – Return to the Basics!
What needs to happen is very simple. We – starting with the POA – need to return to the basics. People moved here for a variety of reasons. If those reasons disappear, they will leave; (some are already leaving due to the toxic environment the POA has created and the fear of HSV becoming something it should never be).
We have a great community – which we are at the risk of losing, if we don’t tackle it now!
I have met with Lloyd Sherman and Dick Garrison on many occasions and we agree on many of the same issues. They both have my support.
Thank you for your support and vote. Now let’s return Hot Springs Village to what it once was!
Sincerely,
Tucker Omohundro
January 16, 2020
Jacob
01/16/2020 — 4:45 pm
Tucker! Thank you so much for running! Your words reflect my thoughts – EXACTLY – and I’m sure echo the wishes of the majority of Property Owners!
Congratulations on putting in to words what most EVERYONE here in HSV FEELS!
You are going to win a seat on the BOD by a landslide victory.
I along with my friends and neighbors are going to spread your good words as far and wide as we can.
You, SIR, are exactly what this Village needs!
You have my vote. And so does Lloyd and Dick!
John Dethardt
01/16/2020 — 4:49 pm
Thank, you have my vote. I meet a gentleman this morning and this is what we talked about, poa need maintenance first and formost.
Mj
01/16/2020 — 5:06 pm
“People moved here for a variety of reasons. If those reasons disappear, they will leave; (some are already leaving due to the toxic environment the POA has created and the fear of HSV becoming something it should never be).”
Tucker, this is EXACTLY why we left 1.5 yrs ago. We are happily living in our new paradise.
Good luck with your candidacy and taking HSV back!
Vicki Husted
01/16/2020 — 7:56 pm
Mj,
Thank you for providing your input from the perspective of one who found a paradise, lost it unfairly, and had to seek another. I’m glad you found a new one, but wish you were still here. I think with the election of Tucker, Lloyd and Dick your original paradise will return to what we all moved here to experience.
Tucker Omohundro, Lloyd Sherman, and Dick Garrison are all devoted to restoring HSV to it’s original intent and harmony. I believe they can do it, and they all have my votes!
Mj
01/17/2020 — 6:40 am
Vicki, we tried with other boardelections to undo what was happening. We trusted the platforms on which the candidates ran only to have them “drink the kool-aid” provided by the village manager. (LN is NOT a CEO!)
We felt at our ages we had to cut the losses we knew we would have to incur…BTW, way too much for this time in our lives! We will never make up our monetary loses but peace of mind and living in a community that isn’t being torn apart by its “leaders” makes up for it. That said it is still sad to see what DT & LN have done to HSV.
Good luck!
Walter Chance
01/16/2020 — 5:47 pm
Exactly. Very well articulated. You have my vote
Minn Daly
01/16/2020 — 5:51 pm
Tucker, you Dick & Lloyd, have my vote! Willingness to help you guys WIN as needed!
Minn Daly
Man from the clouds
01/16/2020 — 5:59 pm
Spot on Target Tucker you got my vote and I just have a question is where you’re going to have your meeting on the 22nd February
HSVP C
01/16/2020 — 6:56 pm
Man from the Clouds, we are having the Meet and Greet on Saturday, February 22, 2020 from 2 p.m. until 5 p.m. Free food, coffee, tea. ShugaBeatz is playing and there will be a cash bar. Hope you can come. Here is a link to the article about the event. https://hotspringsvillagepeople.com/2020-board-candidate-meet-greet/
Mike
01/16/2020 — 6:08 pm
Tucker, Don’t let the “ceo” trip you up. We believe you will make a great board member if you can keep your thoughts and your mind off of her lying
motives and partisan agendas.
Donna
01/16/2020 — 7:45 pm
Tucker, you couldn’t have said it better. Keeping what we have looking like it was built last year is exactly what this village needs. Keep the buildings power washed, the roofs replaced, the landscaping constantly groomed and roads repaired. We all came here because of what was already here ( not towncenters and lodges) or we wouldn’t have come in the first place. It’s what we wanted and want it back now. I think most people will agree to an assessment increase to upgrade our maintenance and structures already in place, but I for one will only vote for an increase when the current CEO and other unnecessary staff are no longer here. Thank you for running and using your precious retirement time to help us get our piece of heaven back.
Vicki Husted
01/16/2020 — 8:03 pm
Donna,
I feel exactly the same way. Thank you for stating it so well and saving me some typing strokes.
Go Tucker!
Go Dick!
Go Lloyd!
Elizabeth Berry
01/16/2020 — 8:04 pm
You have described the village we bought into. Please take us back to what we loved about the village. God has answered my prayers bringing you three gentlemen to our board. And I am sure you will all be on the board. Next let us replace the CEO and many useless department heads hired to do LN job.
Vicki Husted
01/16/2020 — 8:24 pm
Tucker,
I learned about you and your history with the Village not too long after I moved here, having already learned of the Villages founder, the Cooper family. That original legacy is why I left my home of 35 years to move here.
The Coopers passed their legacy into the hands of the residents, with the power needed to maintain it through self-governance. Unfortunately, some who were invested with that power chose to try to concentrate it for themselves to pursue an agenda so that the legitimate power-holders, the owners and residents had diminished control over the Village.
The majority of owners and residents have now begun to see this under-handed (and I believe, illegal) agenda designed to turn our Village into something it never was and never should be, and are prepared to wrest their rightful power back with your leadership and that of Lloyd and Dick fighting with you.
Thank you so much for being willing and able to take on this battle to save HSV!
You have my vote! I look forward so very much to the Village being restored to it’s pristine beauty and the gentle harmony it was designed for!
Jack
01/16/2020 — 9:06 pm
Tucker what are your plans for the property you purchased on DeSoto? Will it be commercial or residential?
Tucker Omohundro
01/17/2020 — 9:26 am
The property is zoned commercial.
Frank Shears aka Bubba
01/16/2020 — 11:09 pm
Standing Ovation!!!
Thank you Tucker. You have our votes! (Rambo, Anne and me)
Frank
Fred
01/17/2020 — 5:43 am
Love your comment – There is no need to add a lodge, town centers, or a new golf course.
Not only is this patently obvious and quite true, but is also is NEVER going to happen. HSV, if you all might recall, couldn’t even get an RV park developer to invest. (remember – by the east gate?) He passed as soon as he took a closer look at the nonsense that was going on politically. And he was right to do so.
There is no developer anywhere who would ever consider building a lodge in HSV, let alone a “town center “ or high density housing, or a pocket neighborhood or anything else for that matter. Every minute and every dollar spent on hopelessly trying to implement the failed and insane “cmp” by the push from the “ceo” is a total and utter waste.
We already have town centers and they are complete with shuttered businesses, worn and tattered old structures, and appear more like third-world “town centers” than anything else. How does anyone in their right mind think adding another one would ever work??
Your mention of The Villages was right on. People who want that can move there. It will never happen in HSV under any circumstances- EVER. There can be no comparison. Those who do are so hopelessly ill-informed it almost makes me sad. Forget The Villages.
As mentioned above by someone else, we too left HSV several years ago. The straw that broke the camel’s back for us was the open gate policy that led to literally dozens and dozens of boaters on Lake Balboa for the July fireworks. None of them residents. Waffle cone vendors on the beach! We knew in our hearts it was time to leave. And we lost well over $150,000 in leaving, but have no regrets. None.
We wish you well and hope that HSV’s ship can be righted. The whole mess there seems like something out of the novel 1984. It would be comical if it wasn’t so destructive. We did not retire to live in a place where a small handful of people can completely take over and totally destroy a once vibrant community.
New urbanism is a deadly disease. And HSV has caught a virulent strain.
Tom Blakeman
01/17/2020 — 7:06 am
Tucker,
First, thanks for stepping up to run. Much appreciated. I like the philosophy you have projected.
But I would like to know a few more specifics including:
1. Will you replace Nalley?
2. Will you shut down and remove the CMP?
3. How will you run marketing if not under POA?
4. What do you propose to fix the broadband and cellular issues which exist?
5. Will you disband the Governance Committee?
6. Will you cancel the “board orientation” and get rid of the misguided consultants who POA have had running it?
7. What are you going to do about collecting assessments owed and growing from defaulters?
8. What is your position on raising assessments and/or special assessments?
9. As a board member to whom do you think your fiduciary duty is owed: the Members or the Corporation?
10. How exactly will you fix the gate problem?
11. When and how will you reverse all the bad bylaw and policy changes which have been forced upon us by the last 4 or 5 boards?
12. How do you propose to fix our failing and $2 million per year losing golf program?
13. What do you think can be done to obtain some payback from the counties of even a little bit of the Millions they collect every year from us in taxes?
Thanks.
PS: I also believe all the other candidates should weigh in on these questions. People besides me do really want to know.
Andy Kramek
01/17/2020 — 9:15 am
“People moved here for a variety of reasons. If those reasons disappear, they will leave; (some are already leaving due to the toxic environment the POA has created and the fear of HSV becoming something it should never be).”
That is exactly correct. Although not the primary reason for our departure (health reasons) it was definitely a major factor in our decision on timing. If the corporation would just stop trying to make HSV something it isn’t and concentrate its efforts on making it the best example of what it is there would be a lot less conflict and animosity.
Having said that, I, like Tom Blakeman, would like to know the answers to his questions and particularly how you propose to get rid of the “Corporation”?
Currently its very existence requires Board Members to accept that its requirements override those of property owners. Furthermore, Board members are, apparently, required to affirm their acquiescence to that requirement in order to be seated.
Doesn’t that, should you be elected, puts you in an untenable position? Either you will accept the requirement (and later breach it – presumably resulting in your losing your seat for cause) or you refuse to accept it and fail to be seated.
Judy
01/17/2020 — 1:55 pm
It would be reassuring to know that our three new board members can pledge allegiance to the corporation and then, with the majority vote, rescind that requirement. Is that likely? Also, did Cooper establish HSV as a corporation or was that Nalley’s handiwork via the CMP?
John
01/17/2020 — 9:36 pm
HSV became a corporation in 1970, 48 years before the CMP.
Mark
01/17/2020 — 4:09 pm
Outstanding news Tucker. Look forward to seeing you put a boot in Nalley’s ample behind.
Lloyd Sherman
01/18/2020 — 10:35 am
Judy – It is my opinion that somewhere, somehow along the way, and to the benefit of particular individuals, it was decided to project the loyalty to that of the organization and not the property owners. That I believe is an interpretation and our current Bylaws state this:
Article IX – Section 3 – Board Accountability: The Board is accountable to the members and to one another for enforcing all rights, covenants, restrictions, and agreements applicable to the Properties and the owners thereof.
I don’t find that vague or hard to understand. The duty is clearly to the property owners who are the organization. The staff is the “hired guns” to carry out the strategy and direction provided by the Board.
The real issue is that an implementation document (CMP) has been added as a governing document, which is really nothing more than a series of recommendations and implementation statements to support the pillars of the CMP which are a Town Center, Pocket Neighborhoods, and Lodging. Nothing wrong with any of those if they worked in this environment and would be built and fully supported by outside developers. It is not the job of the POA to be a developer. They are a maintenance organization. And when you have to go so far as demanding people pledge allegiance to the CMP to serve on committees, you have gone too far.
These issues have to be faced and resolved. We can’t keep kicking cans down the road. I can assure you that is the objective of myself and I certainly believe it is for Tucker and Dick also.
Tucker Omohundro
01/18/2020 — 5:37 pm
To better state my beliefs on a lodge in Hot Springs Village…
I would love to see a hotel/lodge or hotel chain in HSV, but as a business freestanding from the POA. Just like all other businesses such as a grocery store, retailer, restaurant, medical center, etc. a hotel needs to be its own entity.
I am NOT in favor of a lodge being developed, funded, and run by the POA like our other amenities such as golf courses, tennis center, Woodlands, etc. The POA should not be a hotel management company, a restaurateur, a real estate developer, or anything else outside of its original purpose -POA’s were created for administrative purposes and to maintain the infrastructure; it was formed to manage the assessments collected and to take care of the infrastructure; this is what they should only be doing.
I am not sure if the current BOD/CEO has or had plans, (or hopes), of building a lodge, but it has been brought to my attention as a concern by some Villagers… so, I hope this gives the residents of the Hot Springs Village a clearing understanding of my thoughts about a lodge/hotel.
George
01/19/2020 — 10:50 am
Well stated. Should be the motto of this campaign, “POA must maintain, not develop”. Plenty of amenities here, they should be up to date and sparkle. Members will pay for that.
If POA employees cannot get on board with that, then show them the door.
Not glamorous, no big awards, just appreciation for a job well done.
Leaving for “peace of mind” is becoming an option for many here.
ROBERT
01/20/2020 — 12:21 pm
I agree with your ideas. History shows that reasonable people elected get brain washed very quickly to change their minds. Why?
Tom
01/21/2020 — 5:34 pm
We need a change of direction. I agree with Tucker’s letter 100%. HSV was meant to be a retirement community. This change needs to be driven by the board. We need to see an organizational chart. The CEO works FOR the board and needs to be directed BY the board. The board needs to more closely follow the desires of the members, ie the property owners.
Vicki Husted
01/21/2020 — 6:28 pm
Tom,
I agree with you. We are a retirement community, but our marketing needs to be clear that we are NOT, and never have been, age restricted!
Have you gone to the POA and requested a copy of the Org Chart?
When we get Tucker, Lloyd and Dick on the BOD, I think we’ll see the Board exercising the power vested in them and driven by us, the Members!
Thomas Hubert
01/27/2020 — 4:33 pm
I found an org chart on the HSV website and it shows that LN works for the board and would be directed by the board. Even though this is what the org chart shows don’t think that is how it works.
Vicki Husted
01/27/2020 — 5:35 pm
You’re right, Tom. It doesn’t seem to have been working that way for a long time, and many have bemoaned that fact and tried to let the BOD know that it is unacceptable. So far they haven’t been listening very much. Efforts by a large majority of members are still under way to get their attention and convince them they must exercise their fiduciary duties and listen to the members. Here’s one of the current efforts:
Property Owners: Tell Current BOD – Do not extend Nalley’s contract!!
I just signed the petition “Hot Spring Village Property Owners: Do not extend Nalley contract” and am urging others who share this opinion to add their names.
Our goal is to reach 100 signatures and we need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here:
http://chng.it/sgpkBRNw5s
Have your Lot/Block/Addition ready and put it in the comments, which limits signatures to Property Owners
You may vote one time for each property you own.