Understanding the People Side of the Equation
Up to this point, articles from FRATF have focused on the physical assets of Hot Springs Village including roads, facilities, amenities, and services. Now we need to look at our human assets: the employees that provide those services and maintain our roads, facilities, and amenities. Currently, there are approximately 453 POA employees. Just over half (55.4%) are full-time and the remainder is part-time.
It is a challenge to stay fully staffed, especially in today’s very tight job market. Right now, there are 26 job openings to be filled. Being understaffed impacts the quality and level of service we receive here in HSV. If there are manpower shortages in a specific department, hours may have to be shortened at facilities, or services stopped. Sometimes staff can be moved from one department to another to provide coverage but that has consequences too. Work doesn’t get done when and where it needs to be done. The current overall turnover rate is 12.6% (10-12% is considered healthy). However, the “new hire” turnover rate for those who quit within the first year is higher than average (30.2% versus average of 20-25%).
Why Do People Quit?
When someone quits, they are encouraged to participate in an exit survey, although not everyone does. We would like to understand why they want to quit and perhaps remedy the situation. The two top reasons why people quit are:
- They found a job that pays better.
- They don’t have the tools or equipment they need to do their job.
Let’s address item #2 first. In previous articles, the FRATF discussed the issue of an aging infrastructure. Hot Springs Village is 50 years old. Much of the equipment is aging too, including machines, vehicles, and other essential tools and equipment that employees use daily. It’s hard to do your job when you don’t have the right tools for the job or if the equipment constantly needs repair. This impacts productivity and effectiveness and could potentially become a safety concern in some cases. For so many years, we haven’t spent money in this area for budgetary reasons, and this has an impact on employees’ ability to perform their work.
Minimum Wage versus Livable Wage
Now let’s talk about item #1- Employees leaving for a better paying job. In 2021, the Arkansas State minimum wage increased from $10.00 to $11.00. From a full-time employee’s perspective, that’s an additional $40/week in their paycheck. But sadly, minimum wage doesn’t cover life’s essential needs anymore. A newer term, “livable wage” is used to describe the wage required to cover minimum essential needs for housing, clothing and food. Currently, according to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Living Wage Calculator, the minimum livable wage in Arkansas is $13.29/hour for a single adult without children. If someone works full-time at minimum wage and receives benefits such as health insurance and paid time off, this can compensate for some of the difference between minimum and livable wage.
A little more than one-third of POA employees (38.4%) receive minimum wage. The majority (85%) of the minimum wage employees work part-time and are not eligible for benefits. This becomes an employee retention challenge when there are other local employers willing to pay more than minimum wage. McDonald’s, right outside of the West Gate, is currently offering $14.00 starting pay. But increasing the minimum wage within Hot Springs Village would have a significant impact on the POA budget. For every $1 we could increase pay, it would require an additional $1.5 M/year.
Why So Much?
An increase in the minimum wage impacts more than just one pay grade (see end of article for the definition of “pay grade”). It has a cascade effect. When there is an increase in the first pay grade, that could force an increase in the next pay grade. There are more than 20 pay grades in the POA, and each has an established range (minimum salary – maximum salary). The difference between one pay grade and the next is only 3-5% as established by POA policy. In 2020, four pay grades were impacted by the minimum wage increase and in 2021, five pay grades were impacted by the increase in minimum wage to $11/hour. To put that in terms of staffing, roughly 75% of POA employees would be impacted if the minimum wage were increased by $1.
Staying Competitive
Salaries for some POA job positions have been questioned through the years. In the past couple of years cuts to upper management positions have led to $954K in savings. Moving forward it is the goal of the POA to offer fair and competitive salaries. A recent in-depth analysis was conducted comparing POA job positions with other similar positions within the State of Arkansas and across the United States using databases from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and job search websites. Job positions in all paygrades were surveyed including maintenance workers, greenskeepers, technicians, public safety (fire and police), electricians, managers, supervisors, directors, and others.
The analysis found that there are 101 job positions at pay grade levels ranging from 1-18 that were paid approximately 19.7% less than the average for their positions. Just 39 job positions at pay grade levels ranging from 2-18 were paid on average 11% more than the average for their positions. Reasons why they are above the average include their education, 5+ years experience, added certifications, and tenure. The analysis confirmed which job positions are not competitive in their pay, and to retain those employees, compensation recommendations will be made during the budget build process.
In Summary
The POA staff have served the membership well over the years. Through the budget struggles, they have been making do and cutting back. Our employees are Hot Springs Village’s greatest asset. We need to invest in them just as much as we do in the other aspects of the Village. FRATF analysis shows that cutting staff or staffing budgets to solve the financial issues will not achieve the desired goal. The data suggests a focus on maintaining our staffing is required to address our infrastructure and equipment needs. Staffing is needed to operate and maintain the Village. Employees who have what they need to do their work are more productive, especially when they feel they are compensated fairly.
Note: “Pay grade” – A pay grade is a step within a compensation system that defines the amount of pay an employee will receive. The pay grade is generally defined by the level of the responsibilities performed within the job description of the position, the authority exercised by the position, and the length of time the employee has performed the job.
Hot Springs Village FRATF Human Resource Statistics
POA-Human-Resource-StatisticsClick here to visit the FRATF page on the HSVPOA website for FAQ’s, Articles, Infographics, and More!
Note from Cheryl: The above article from the Future Revenue Analysis Task Force (FRATF) was emailed to Hot Springs Village Property Owners on July 27, 2021.
* * *
Thank you for reading. If you like, please comment below. We love to hear your opinion, but comments must be made using your first and last real name, or they will not be accepted. If you would like to submit an article for publication, please contact us through this website. Be sure to bookmark this website. Click here to visit the Hot Springs Village People Facebook Group.
Don Heffron
07/27/2021 — 7:19 pm
Thank you for the data and bringing this subject forward for discussion. Are these pay grades and amounts in some public forum?
Lloyd Sherman
07/28/2021 — 11:39 am
No. I have them which I got through an Information Request. However, HR indicated they were employee sensitive (which they are not) and that they couldn’t be shared with other members. The court ruling we have says otherwise as this information should be standardly shared with the property owners.
Tom Blakeman
07/28/2021 — 6:59 am
Who did the “A recent in-depth analysis”, what was their qualification to do such analysis, and when was it done?
Lloyd Sherman
07/28/2021 — 11:40 am
I would like to know the answer to that question also.
Bob Mollerberg
07/28/2021 — 4:29 pm
I too would like to know the answer to Tom Blakeman’s questions.
Mark Oliver
07/28/2021 — 2:08 pm
Publish the salaries! Show us the proof!
Tom Blakeman
07/29/2021 — 7:33 am
There’s a third main reason people quit their jobs and go elsewhere. Because they can no longer stand working for an arrogant, stupid leadership or boss and seeing dumb decisions being made all around them.
steve bylow
07/29/2021 — 7:04 pm
Since volunteering my services to help hire the last CEO (Charles King) and current HR Manager I have not been involved but I would like to state that I think they and the Board did a great job of eliminating some high level positions which were part of Nalley Experiment.
Yes it is sad Charles left and also sad our Board could not stay alighned but in my opinion we are in a much better space than we were prior to the LTD transition.
I still feel the key is hiring a GM with a great breadth of relevant experience but we’ll see what happens.
Steve
Lloyd Sherman
07/30/2021 — 1:49 pm
Steve – Thank you for the assistance you provided during the process of hiring Mr. King, but clearly something went seriously wrong. I personally was not in favor of hiring a GM at that time and wanted the Board to take the reigns for at least six months to facilitate staffing changes that needed to be done. As only one voice of a group that must speak as one based on the majority, I obviously did not prevail in that instance. Two weeks after Mr. King arrived I had already reached a point where I didn’t think he was the right choice, but decided to provide a pretty much standard 90 period before I said much of anything. During the next 2.5 months my opinion didn’t change and I chose to inform the voting members of our board what my concerns were (in writing). One of those board members decided they should share my confidential correspondence to them with Mr. King. And you might well imagine the fallout that occurred once that happened. This was to be a discussion document for the board, not a performance evaluation to be shared with the incumbent. The board was given an opportunity to determine who violated this confidence and remove them. They chose not to do so, and that combined with way too many other concerns I had led to my resignation. No board can stay aligned when activities of this nature are going on within their own ranks.
So yes, we are in a better place than we were, but nowhere close to where we need to be. We have major disconnects between job descriptions and what some of our personnel are actually doing. We have no real compensation program, other than throwing a number against the wall and seeing if it sticks. Not one comp plan is based improvements to our revenues or effective cost management. You are paid your salary if you show up for work. We have way too many Director, Manager, Superintendent, Foreman titles. I could go on, but it appears no one is listening.
So what happens next? Will we hire another home-grown product of the POA who has neither the knowledge or experience to be a true General Manager? Will the board give into the noise being made about hiring a City Manager? Will we spend $50,000-$60,000 to have an Executive Search firm find us another GM at over $200K a year? Will any of these people have turnaround experience, which is what this organization needs at this point?
Rant is over, but thank you again for volunteering your time to try and help the board make the right decision. Hasn’t worked three times in a row so I am skeptical as to exactly how informed this board will be where others didn’t appear to be.
Michael R Shannon
08/01/2021 — 7:03 am
I’m concerned that the committee adopts the terminology and agenda of the left in this discussion of a “living wage.” Switzerland has no minimum wage laws at all and its hardly a third-world country.
A more reasonable argument for raising wages is competition. If McDonald’s is offering a higher starting wage — Walmart certainly is — then HSV will have to raise its starting wage or see the better employees leave for the higher wage.
Let’s leave the leftist jargon to the left.
Gene Garner
08/01/2021 — 12:00 pm
There is no federally mandated minimum wage in Switzerland but In 2017 and 2018, respectively, the cantons of Neuchâtel and Jura each introduced a minimum wage of CHF20 (about US$21.82). In the canton of Ticino a minimum wage of CHF19.75 to CHF20.25 (about US$21.55 to US$22.09) per hour will be gradually introduced in three steps starting January 1, 2021. Voters in the cities of Winterthur, Zurich, and Kloten in the canton of Zurich submitted or are in the process of submitting popular initiatives to introduce a local minimum wage of CHF23. Also on September 27, 2020, Swiss voters in the canton of Geneva approved by a vote of 50.03% to 49.97% a popular initiative that introduces a minimum wage of 23 Swiss Francs (CHF) (about US$25) per hour for all industries
While there’s no federal minimum wage in Switzerland a number of cantons are introducing their own versions of a minimum wage.—Gene
Maxine klein
08/01/2021 — 7:13 am
Excellent article!
shadrick C fincher
09/25/2021 — 12:59 pm
Does POA employees get any discounts on activities such as the fitness center, concerts, etc.? Thanks