Omohundro Presents Motion to Purchase 2115 Hot Springs Village Lots from Land Commissioner
At the June 16, 2021 Board of Directors Regular Meeting, Director Omohundro made a motion to submit an offer of $22.50 per lot for the purchase of 2115 (the motion says 2118) Hot Springs Village lots located in Saline and Garland County from the Arkansas Commissioner of State Lands for a total purchase price of $47,655. These lots have delinquencies in both property taxes and POA assessments.
Several directors seconded the motion.
Omohundro said, “Stephanie Heffer provided a lot-strategy presentation to the Board of Directors during the 2021 annual retreat to discuss delinquent properties, strategies for collection of those properties, and recent transactions that are occurring with lot sales by the Commissioner of State Lands.”
Staff Met With State Land Commissioner
“The Board at that time directed staff to further research the status of the lots held by the Commissioner and provide the Board with a recommendation strategy going forward. John Paul, Kevin Sexton, and Stephanie Heffer met with Tommy Lands, the State Land Commissioner; Kelly Boyd, Chief Deputy; and Lisa Pelton, Director of Real Estate with Arkansas Commissioner of State Land on May 18, 2021,” explained Omohundro.
“The goal of the meeting was:
- To assess what entities or individuals are purchasing the land,
- What the likelihood of future assessment revenue is, and
- What options if any are there for the Hot Springs Village Property Owners’ Association to purchase the remaining inventory of lots held by the Commissioner.”
It was determined that there were 2,115 lots held by the Commissioner in both Saline and Garland Counties. These lots were in a ‘negotiable’ state. This means the POA may make a reasonable offer for purchase and upon acceptance would receive Special Warranty Deeds for the properties.
One hundred and sixty-eight additional properties are not negotiable until two years has passed from the original auction date At this time, it would cost the POA $31,489.16 in back taxes and Staff does not recommend doing this.
Reasons For Staff Recommendation of Purchase of Lots
- Mitigate risk of costly POA development costs in unserved areas. (Areas with little or no existing infrastructure, i.e., water, sewer or roadways)
- Reduce costs associated with delinquent assessment collections.
- Use POA owned land for timber sales adding a new revenue source.
- Improve ability to hold a successful campaign where votes of property owners in good standing are required to meet quorum.
- Encourage ‘scaled’ development in specific targeted areas of the Village with cluster housing instead of the shotgun approach we have today.
- Take lots out of inventory that are in natural drainage ways or are otherwise unbuildable or cost-prohibitive for construction.
- Lots in some cases can be used for trail crossings or trail construction in areas where little or no existing amenities exist.
- Lots in developed neighborhoods can be used as green space or park space to improve livability of the area.
- Remaining lots, those that are undeveloped and prime for home construction will have a higher value and be sellable by either real estate companies or for sale by owner. Right now, the glut of lots available for sale have brought the prices down to a level that is detrimental to all property values.
- Ensure large investor groups do not purchase blocks of properties with an intent to control a vote or have an unfair influcnece over a vote presented to the property owners for consideration.
- The lot sales occurring at the Commissioner’s office overinflate POA revenue and under account for bad debt. Attaining the lots will provide the Association with a realistic and sustainable assumption for assessment collections to better budget for current and future capital needs.
Director Sexton was able to negotiate the price of the lots down to $22.50 per lot from an original offer of $25.00
The total purchase cost will be $47,655 and is not budgeted but will be offset by lot sales from the POA inventory.
The total additional annual recurring tax liability for these lots will be approximately $28,000.
Heffer said, “there are many reasons [to purchase the lots]. The first and foremost is having control of those properties where now they are in a perpetual cycle of delinquency. Over and over and over.”
“As recently as 30 to 45 days ago, [around] 2,000 of these properties have been sold by the Commissioner to all kinds of prospecting entities across the country and even out of the country that we don’t anticipate realizing any assessment revenue from in the future. They will end up back in this cycle, which is basically a seven-year cycle where we are spending money on collections. These lots overinflate our revenue projections. It just makes good sound sense to get these things back in our inventory so that we can be proactive about how we then utilize them. Whether we are trying to build on them with builder partners, placing them in some kind of suspension strategy because we don’t really want to build in those areas. It would be costly for us as a POA. Those are some of the main reasons,” stated Heffer.
“Taking the lots out of inventory will improve property values…We have such a glut in our lot inventory that lot prices are very, very low unless you are on a golf course, on a lake,” explained Heffer.
Chair Corry said, “with the speculators that occurred 30 to 45 days ago, does that in any way cost us manpower, people, when they come in?”
Heffer responded, “we have one employee dedicated to it, pretty much. That is all she does is manage these properties that are changing hands from the Commissioner.”
Corry asked, “how many are changing hands due to the sale at the Commissioner – the Speculation?”
Heffer answered, “there is none now. The action we would be taking would take all but 158 out of that inventory. It really would put a stop to it.”
These lots may not have clear title. This is looked at inhouse (in the POA).
Director Avila asked, “did you indicate when we had our Discussion Session that some of the other HOA’s like Bella Vista and Cherokee Village, that those speculators had gone after land there, too?”
Heffer said that Bella Vista is an exception. “They have NO land for sale through the Commissioner. But they have a very hot market. Their market is very different than ours. But you look at Cherokee Village, Holiday Island, Fairfield Bay, there are a number of other master-planned private communities in the state that are very much like us and they are seeing the exact same kind of traffic.”
Director McLeod said, “they are getting these speculators and some of them are from out of the country and they are just buying a whole bunch of lots. Nothing is going to happen with them. They are going to turn around and try to sell them and make some money on them and they could be in the middle of nowhere. When they do that, somebody buys a lot and they decide to build a house we have to put the road in…,” sewer, water. We need to get control of all those things and the 2,000 that we don’t have control of are probably going to cost us a lot of money over the years. But we need to get control of as many as we can.”
Heffer stated, “while this doesn’t eliminate our risk, it certainly mitigates it. The POA will have close to 7,000 lots in our inventory and we start to get to a more manageable level where we don’t have quite the risk out there.”
Interim General Manager, John Paul, said this allows us to see where there is a grouping of lots we own and we can approach builders or a developer and sell these properties in a cluster.”
McLeod said, “this helps us control our future.”
Heffer said, “we are having a pretty good year in lot sales….we have collected in excess of $90,000 to date on POA lot sales.”
“This gives us an opportunity to generate more income in the future,” explained Heffer.
The motion passed unanimously.
14_Memo__Fact_Sheet_-_AR_Commissioner_of_State_Lands_By Cheryl Dowden, June 20, 2021
* * *
Thank you for reading. If you like, please comment below. We love to hear your opinion, but comments must be made using your first and last real name, or they will not be accepted. If you would like to submit an article for publication, please contact us through this website. Be sure to bookmark this website. Click here to visit the Hot Springs Village People Facebook Group.
Charlotte Pennington
06/20/2021 — 2:12 pm
I like the sound of a business based approach for this purchase. The other attractive part of this justification is that it includes a potential option for developing green/recreation areas for Property Owners. AND that there would be potential future revenue from timber, etc.
A great write up for what is going on with this approved purchase.
Dee Dixon
06/20/2021 — 8:04 pm
Based on what I read above, this sounds like better decision-making than in some previous years. I do appreciate the summaries with some details added to help me have a more knowledgeable view of the pros & cons of an issue such as this one. Thank you.
Tom Blakeman
06/21/2021 — 7:14 am
What they don’t mention is how various sales of commercial and Cooper reserved properties are going on right now and right under our noses and nobody is aware until it is too late. Just last year cooper sold the Cortez beach island and the board and property owners were clueless until right before it happened. Of course at the time Nalley was in charge and our finances were strapped so it would have required some stress for POA to buy the property.
There are now commercial real estate signs in many places. Several sales have taken place already. And at least one piece of what was thought to be common property (actually Cooper property) now all of a sudden has a “Posted” sign on it. If we had a POA and board worth a flip there would be maps and lists available showing just who owns what, what’s for sale, who has bought what and so on.
Don’t be surprised when a hi-rise condo goes up just down the street from your secluded woodland home.
Gene Garner
06/21/2021 — 8:50 am
The POA at one time sent email alerts to all that signed up, a list of the lots that were being auctioned at the Saline County Court House. That’s how I bought the lot next door.
This was a good indicator of the health of our real estate market and the number of lots that were being returned. It also gave an indication of the market value of your home and neighborhood. –Gene
Russ Wright
06/22/2021 — 8:20 am
Are these voting lots? Does the POA now have 2000+ votes?
HSVP C
06/22/2021 — 9:05 am
Russ, good question. The HSVPOA can use the lots it owns to make certain a quorum is met. This is what the Bylaws say: “Votes deriving from lots owned by the Property Owners Association will be
cast in the same proportion as the votes cast by all other members in good standing on all remaining elections under the Declaration.” The POA cannot vote in Board of Director elections. The POA can vote (in order for a quorum to be met) in the following situations:
1. An assessment increase (special or regular) over the Southern CPI,
2. Transfer of common property, and
3. Changes in the Declaration.
Hope this helps. Thank you.
Bob Mollerberg
06/22/2021 — 12:02 pm
Help me understand this. These lots will be purchased with funds from the POA Treasury. These lots may or may not ever produce any revenue back to the POA. In addition, we will have to pay $28,000 annually in taxes on these lots. How is it that these lots could ever be considered “in good standing” since they do not pay dues? Also, are other lots in the POA inventory paying dues? If not, how can any of these properties ever be considered (voted) in any voting process?
HSVP C
06/22/2021 — 12:54 pm
Bob, the best way I can answer your question about whether the POA properties can be used to cast a vote is to refer you to one of the first articles on this website. This article is about the results of the Articles of Incorporation and Amendment Changes vote which occurred in 2018. You may recall, that was the vote where Lorri Street had 3 Forums and John Cooper set up an office in the Village. Here is a link to that article. https://hotspringsvillagepeople.com/hot-springs-village-property-owners-defeat-proposed-amendment-changes/
Here are the results of that vote:
2018 DECLARATION & ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION VOTE RESULTS
Total Votes Cast: 14,151
POA Lots Votes Cast 3,000
Quorum Met: YES
1. Yes, the lots will be (or already are) purchased with POA funds.
2. True, the POA-owned lots may or may not ever produce any revenue back to the POA.
3. Yes, the POA must pay the property taxes (going forward) on these POA-owned lots.
4. The Governing Documents give the POA the right to make a quorum. (See above results from the “Amendment” vote.
5. No, other POA-owned lots are not paying dues.
6. Since the POA does not have to pay itself assessment money on lots it owns, the property is always in good standing with the POA.
I hope this makes sense. Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Kirk Denger
07/05/2021 — 9:56 pm
Without the 3000 POA lots voting, a quorum would not have been met on the 13 Declaration amendments and the amendments would automatically fail.
This is how dangerous it is to allow the administration to vote for their self-serving agenda with votes from lots not in good standing.
Tom Blakeman
06/23/2021 — 5:01 pm
Bob, back in 2014 or 2015 the POA and BOD tinkered with the rules for making a quorum so that they could pass the Two Tier Plan which had failed on the first vote due to lack of quorum. They are now reinforcing that position.
Steven Kates
02/10/2022 — 11:12 pm
Will the POA be offering these lots for purchase at a substantial reduced cost for currently good standing HSV property owners like they did many years ago? If so, can you produce a list of those lots that will be offered, their location on HSV plat maps and purchase price, thank you.