By Lloyd Sherman and Diana Podawiltz, February 4, 2021
Following the release of the story by the Voice this last week and the failure of complete answers supplied by both Diana and Lloyd, and while we were attempting to take a high road in not keeping this fiasco alive, we also felt it was necessary to provide further details.
When Diana & Lloyd ran for the Board, they did so to bring business-based management and stop operating our $30M + operation as a playground using the “good ole boy” concepts. We are blessed to be owners of a very beautiful and unique place, and we wanted an opportunity to give back to the community we love.
These two former chairs were saddened, appalled, and disgusted at the harm done to our Village at the last board meeting at the hands of our Board of Directors. It’s unfathomable to us why a Board would release in its entirety a personnel document that contains legally actionable items jeopardizing our association when the resignation letter onto a non POA FB page on Monday evening. Then, 2 days later, the board allows a resigned employee to be recorded on the Internet and make a statement on a local radio station to rant and denigrate many of our residents and two former Chairs of the Board with misleading, opinionated, and inaccurate statements. Mr. King says he has emails, photos of texts, etc. When this was first mentioned in a Board Eblast when Lloyd resigned, we asked for this documentation to be given to us; Request Denied. Diana was told the information did not pertain to her even though the press release written by Pam Avila said “former board members.” After Wednesday’s Board meeting, Diana asked for a Special Meeting so the comments made about Lloyd & she could be addressed. Again, the request was denied as it was deemed to not be in the best interest of the Village.
Lloyd Sherman and Diana campaigned together for a seat on the board in 2019. Both of them had a platform whereby they wanted to reduce overhead, cut the fat and get the Village out of a very one-sided contract. Others have run with the same “promises”. We stuck to our word. Diana cannot begin to tell you how many employees thanked her this past Spring and Summer because they could finally come to work without “feeling oppressed.” That the environment was changing so much for the better because of the message Diana was promoting that we were a team: Board, all Staff, and owners.
Lloyd and Diana have no idea what happens to certain people when they’ve been on the board for a while where they seem to get “power fever” or something and start turning a blind eye. Lloyd and Diana never wavered. We never wanted to resign but were left with little choice by the actions of our fellow Board members. The residents of this Village were counting on “the Calvary” (LTD) in joining Diana on the board; we would have the majority vote, be able to make changes to the bylaws to provide more board control of operations.
One of the most important things we needed was to make the Corporate Treasurer position a volunteer position reporting directly to the Board. This also removes the double jeopardy of a staff accountant (no one can serve 2 masters) and reduces the workload for paid staff. The Corporate Treasurer’s job is to analyze and tell the story of the financial statements prepared by staff. This position is also responsible for investing our reserve funds and move money as needed. This is something that’s been sadly lacking for years. All of the checks and balances were removed, board control (a campaign promise by many and verbal agreement from appointees) was decimated by Diana’s removal as chair and subsequent board resignation. It’s a real shame that the exemplary job being done by Wayne Foltz was totally trashed by the recent events. Diana feels worse about Wayne’s denigration with falsehoods than her own as she asked for him to begin volunteering to help the POA in June 2019. He first served diligently beginning in 2019 serving on the Budget Committee, moved to the Finance Committee, and then to the Finance and Planning Committee, which were chartered to be chaired by the Corporate Treasurer.
Wayne has an accounting background and also worked as a money manager – a perfect fit. Diana met Wayne at Pickleball, we never socialized, but it was a great business relationship for the POA. As far as the investigation that Charles referred to, he’s wrong about the findings. It’s my understanding from the several employees involved in the research that the pieces of the puzzle were very close to being in place when Wayne was removed.
Responding to some of Charles King’s misleading statements:
Let’s begin with the first time we met him. His interview was arranged & scheduled by Director Garrison who was the lead in the recruitment process. Garrison did not want Diana & Lloyd’s involvement in the process. As this was a last-minute visitation, Lloyd made lodging arrangements for one night, and then both of us had limited access to Mr. King during his short stay.
Diana was scheduled to meet Mr. King at the Admin Building on Saturday morning before a previous scheduled Pickleball match. Garrison was supposed to bring the candidate by the courts for a tour later that morning for a tour; no show. Diana asked Garrison repeatedly if they would like for her to join them later in the afternoon; the answer was no, “we’ll see you at dinner.”
The next morning, Chair Podawiltz received a call from Director Garrison telling her, “go to church and pray, I don’t want your presence at the job offer breakfast.” Diana told him she would be joining them for breakfast as the offer was unsigned, and she was the only board member with signature authority.
Lloyd and Diana did meet with Charles on or near August 1st. They informed Charles that the POA was top-heavy, that our interim GM had presented us with a reorganization plan prior to handing over the reins. We briefly discussed these changes and strongly encouraged him to utilize the knowledge and expertise of our interim GM. John Paul also made it very clear to Charles that he was available. Charles never called. Mr. King was never given direct orders to fire anyone.
Diana finds it very perplexing that she had such a huge role in Charles’ job dissatisfaction as she was only on the board for 12 days of his 5 1/2-month tenure. And during that time made it perfectly clear she was available to help in any manner. He never once reached out nor; did he speak with her when she was at the POA working with Ella. He had a full plate and she understood he was very busy meeting the staff. Diana also reached out to him in October after COVID recovery to ask how he and his family were doing. It was a very pleasant exchange.
Mr. King also alleged during his rant that Lloyd and he met only once. This is a total fabrication. Lloyd had several individual meetings with Mr. King in addition to Strategy Sessions. Mr. King should have been painfully aware that, in particular, Lloyd was asking for more communication from him to both the Board and the property owners. Which, BTW, never happened. In fact, we heard more in this last board meeting about what staff was doing than we ever heard from Mr. King.
During his rant on Wednesday, Charles discussed a personnel issue and very much misrepresented the facts. Everything that took place regarding the alleged personnel issue was done under the advice of our legal counsel at Rose Law Firm and administered by the Interim GM.
Mr. King further alleged that Lloyd was conducting nefarious investigations into employees. Another total fabrication. What Lloyd was doing was deep dives into bids that had been let, RFP’s and the process and procedures associated with this activity. Could that have led to individuals? We will never know because Mr. King ensured the resources being utilized for this discovery process were systematically removed. No one was ever accused of wrongdoing! The process was never finished. However, this points to the platforms that several of us ran on which was transparency and improvement in operations. What was the reason given for avoiding this research? You are interfering with operations. Really? So, asking for records that through a court order are legally available to all property owners, that is interfering with operations? Lloyd makes no apologies for doing exactly what he promised the property owners he was going to do. The real question is why wasn’t the GM participating in these types of activities? The Voice actually asked both of us if we had planted a mole inside the POA. They further asked Lloyd what he knew about “Operation Kickback”. Diana and Lloyd were interviewed separately and both deny a “mole” was ever planted in the POA. Lloyd indicated he knew nothing about “Operation Kickback” and was told that the document Mr. King was waving around had his name in the string. It wasn’t from Lloyd or to Lloyd and Lloyd doesn’t recall any such email or text and would have asked about it had he seen anything of this nature. Somebody’s imagination was running wild and it appears they pulled in several staff and Board believers.
Then on a legal front, who authorized the POA to access privileged emails or texts? How did an employee or a Board member get his hands on any documentation not meant for him? Was it leaked from the Board? I mean, after all, at least two individuals have on their records that they have done so in the past. Why didn’t the Board member(s) know this was going on? Why were they never approached and asked for their side of any conspiracy theory that had been conjured up? Again, people were getting close to exposing holes in our business model. Wasn’t that what the property owners wanted when they changed out the business-as-usual Boards? And so what if a board member or members was/were investigating potential wrongdoing or complaints from whistleblowers? Again, if not the board, then who?
This story could go on, but as we have reviewed Mr. King’s comments several times, we find ourselves confused as to who and why he resigned (quit) after he accused us of quitting. Who is at fault for his decision? The property owners for harassing and bullying him, or Lloyd and Diana because he wasn’t doing what he was hired to do? Don’t you find it a bit odd that two previous board chairs who were not convinced we had made the right hiring choice were the ones who resigned from the board after his arrival?
* * *
Thank you for reading. Be sure to bookmark this website. Click here to visit the Hot Springs Village People Facebook Group.
Fred Hale
02/04/2021 — 5:21 pm
It is over. It is done. Move on.
Tom Blakeman
02/04/2021 — 6:45 pm
No, it’s not done, not over.
What’s needed is a complete and independent “deep dive”, “forensic audit”, “investigation”, or whatever you want to call it, into all the contracts, decisions, expense accounts, employee contracts, activities and management and BOARD decisions going back at least five or seven years. There’s been something rotten in HSV for a long time and it needs to be brought to light. And NO, this is not bitching and complaining! It is simply needing to get to the TRUTH.
We spent over half a million of all our assessment dollars on a fabricated pipe dream a.k.a. The CMP. Let’s spend a few bucks on finding out why this Village is a serial disaster. We are now spending almost $40,000,000 per year on this place and we need to find out where it is really all going and why.
Kathy Parks
02/05/2021 — 3:26 pm
There are remedies for this POA not being transparent with the property owners, in particular regarding financial matters. There needs to be a full audit conducted.
Diana Podawiltz
02/04/2021 — 6:36 pm
Glad to do so. Chair, Omohundro and his cronies can’t seem to let this go and many people have no clue as to both sides of the story.
In fact, I moved on August 12, 2020 but current board members keep dragging me in to the drama.
Tucker Omohundro
02/04/2021 — 7:57 pm
Diana I let it go by not calling out you and Lloyd as you continued to attack the board. I told Lloyd and I will tell you now. I will not keep letting this happen. Diana you know better than most. I really do not have but one agenda. To do the best I can for the community. I along with all other board members figured out that you as the chair was not the right direction to accomplish this. Yes, all of the board members agreed. I will be posting the emails from the board that supports what I am saying. It will start with Lloyds email shortly after you went on vacation. Truthfully you never have lied or said anything that was not your opinion. I have told you that in emails that we have shared. The only problem that I have had with you is that you are after revenge. You take that revenge on me. That’s ok, because I say what I think now and then. Most of the board have stood behind what happened. Lloyd has not. I would still do anything I could today for you if you called me. What is terribly disappointing to me is that you know this about me. I did not ask to vote you off as the board chair because I didn’t like you. I ask because you were not doing what I thought was best for the community. I hate that I have to now show all what really transpired. I have really tried to stop you and Lloyd. You have left me no choice. I wish you the best Diana.
Tucker Omohundro
02/04/2021 — 8:30 pm
Diana you and Lloyd would not let it go. I liked you and honestly still do. Most could not say that after all the attacks you have had for me. That’s who I am. I have sit back and watched what you and Lloyd have done. I will sit back no more. Many things are going to come out. None I think will discredit your character because the board never did. It will actually show you and many others the facts. I apologize now for what is going to be exposed. I told you in a private email I did not want to do this. You obviously did not care. I am sorry but it has to be said. I tried to not do this. You and Lloyd have given me no choice. You and the villagers need to know.
Dan Hitch
02/04/2021 — 9:51 pm
This sounds like the script for ” The Music Man”
Gary Godfrey
02/05/2021 — 9:15 am
I left the Village five years ago after living there for 15 years. The writing was on the wall then to get out because of the way all these boards operate. Its not any better now then it was when I left.
Stephen Rust
02/05/2021 — 11:03 am
My understanding of governance documents is that individual board members have no power. The board chair would not have had power to be doing things that weren’t best for the community because the chair has no power on their own. Therefore, I don’t completely understand the comment about removing the board chair because they were not doing what was best for the community, because the board as a whole would have to vote on any action taken.
Was the board chair domineering, possibly so, therefore the removal of the chair might have been to remove a domineering person rather than remove someone that wasn’t doing what was best for the community. My opinion, is that since I have lived here, all chairs, past and present are at least a little domineering.
As to all the board agreeing the chair should be removed, I did not see emails, but I did see how each voted on removal. If all agreed in emails that the chair should be removed, then at least one board member didn’t have the courage to vote for removal. There was a vote of abstinence which in my opinion should never have happened in such an important decision. Every board member should have had the courage to vote either for or against removal.
I have been told by a board member to think reasonably or logically. Having read and listened to both sides, my opinion is that there are reasons to doubt that either side is telling the complete truth.
HSVP C
02/05/2021 — 11:30 am
Stephen, weren’t there two abstentions in that vote? There was a majority, so the end result was the same. You do make some good points.
Diana Podawiltz
02/05/2021 — 4:19 pm
Stephen, you’re a smart man. It makes no difference why Tucker sought the votes of elected Director Denger and appointed Directors: Avila & Corry. The point is that then the BOD started throwing away their control by returning the Corporate Treasurer position to a staff position. That portion of our document is very important. What was said about and done to a volunteer was despicable.
Please feel free to watch all the videos of the meetings I chaired. I’m proud of my body of work (got off to a very ruff start with the first meeting, it was not very well organized) and helped to accomplish many things which were very beneficial to the Village. I had more goals which I think would’ve also been important to attain. It was not to be. My days of service to this community have ended.
As far as you doubting whether or not I’m being truthful, I answer to a much higher power than you. There are facts and there are opinions.
HSVP C
02/05/2021 — 5:42 pm
Anonymous comments or comments made using only first names are not being accepted. If you want your comment posted, please use your full name. Thank you. – Cheryl Dowden
Frank Morgan
02/06/2021 — 5:16 am
What went wrong is that we have amateurs attempting to do professional jobs. Plain and simple.
Andy Kramek
02/06/2021 — 7:26 am
Agree 100%. What’s more, nothing will change until the whole approach to managing the Village changes. Repeating the same thing over again and expecting different results remains the definition of insanity!
Bob Mollerberg
02/06/2021 — 10:30 am
Thorough, candidate vetting would be a good place to start!!
John Szczepaniak
02/06/2021 — 12:52 pm
I do think we need to give those who want to serve as directors some credit for putting themselves out there. They are giving up up to 3 years of their limited life to serve us for a lot of grief and no compensation. This place is still a good place to live but not for everybody. It may seem like a “slice of heaven” to some but not so much to others. What core values can we agree on here and what conflicts can we mend? How many can realize that this is not just a retirement place but also a vast recreation place that members cannot or will not fully support? There are no easy answers but I think we should not “get personal” but work things out in a dignified manner… or at least move in that direction.