To All Hot Springs Village Property Owners:
This is Marcy Mermel and I would like to share with you this recent email exchange between me and with the Board of Directors (until they decided not to reply, that is) addressing their Assessment Increase announcement at the Wednesday regular Board Meeting. [August 18, 2021]
We were told that they had already discussed the issue in a private executive session. Assessments and Budget issues are NOT considered material for a private session. After the FRATF Presentation on 8/4, it was the Board’s fiduciary responsibility to discuss the issue publicly either that day or on another date.
Instead, we were told they chose a “turbocharged” Option 1 and will be voting on it in ONE WEEK!
Please see below what I proposed and later begged them to do. We need time to ask questions now.
After reading I ask that you please take a moment to address the board – letting them know we have a right to receive answers to all our questions, now that they have unveiled their “over the top” intentions.
1st Email to the Board of Directors and Joanne Corry on Thursday, 8/19 (please excuse the reference, should have said “Yesterday”)
Dear Members of the Board –
Now that we have been quasi-enlightened with your intentions during this morning’s meeting, I would strongly request changing your strategy regarding your plans for next week.
Although I attended all task force town halls, listened to their presentation of August 4th , actually participated in a suggestion that was vetted by Rose, and have studied their PDF twice through, none of that really mattered until today when the board set its intentions, which, by the way, are still not clear.
If you want to be perfectly transparent about this (first I am not sure why your meetings are in executive session – assessment increase or any use of funds, budgeting, etc., were ever one of the reasons for executive session, but what is done is done), not only should the Discussion AND Vote be done publicly, but you should also be doing this by rollcall vote for documentation purposes.
That said, I would wish that you strongly consider the following:
Instead of an Executive Session to vote on what we just learned today are your intentions, schedule a Town Hall in the next week with you as Board Members, and anyone else from Staff or FRATF to be up on stage, all as a seated panel. Please set up 3 aisles with designated, secured (by operators) open mikes and answer all the questions that are now relevant and pertinent since we have only learned today what the Board’s actual intentions are.
Answering individual emails does not help others that have the same questions. It is also a horrible avenue for rebuttal or follow-up questions.
This would not only be informative for you, but show true transparency.
In reality, the options as presented skewed the most correct, fairest, and most successful “option” which would be number “4”: a combination of the three! If you are willing to go away from the Options suggestions, which Tucker stated today, then surely you would be willing to take the best of all three and get it right!
Please, I beseech you, give the property owners an opportunity to be clear about this with a Town Hall next week and postpone your vote until you really give the residents (that as Tucker said are “paying the price”) an occasion to truly understand.
The Residents of HSV need and deserve a chance to ask the relevant and pertinent questions that are now before us, given today’s information.
Respectfully submitted,
Reply from Tucker Omohundro Thursday, 8/19
The meeting will be public. Property owners have a week to reach out to the board. The vote will be done next week at the meeting.
Response to Tucker Omohundro, Board, and J Corry Thursday, 8/19
Hi Tucker – or Pam? Not sure who is answering.
Thank you for the correction – so the voting meeting will be public.
That really doesn’t answer or even approach any of the questions or issues I have submitted here.
If I send you a list of questions, would you be willing to answer them?
Why would we not do that for everyone?
Reply from Tucker Omohundro Thursday, 8/19
I will answer any questions you have.
Response to Tucker Omohundro, Board, and J Corry Thursday, 8/19
First, is it Tucker who is actually responding to my email and if so, are you/is he speaking on behalf of the whole board in answering these questions?
Reply from Tucker Omohundro Thursday, 8/19
It is Tucker. Your questions will be answered by me and or the board. It will be clear who is answering.
2nd attempt at Readdress to Tucker Omohundro, Board, and J Corry Thursday, 8/19
Thanks so much and that would be great. Instead of asking one by one, let me create a list for you so we can all be more efficient.
BTW, I wanted to confirm that you are aware that although FRATF gave their presentation on 8/4, “FRATF will provide additional information as requested by the POA Board and their assessment team.”
So FRATF would be willing to support the Board in a Paneled Town Hall, should you ask them to do so.
Also, “Another forum by FRATF (hosted by the Voice) was under consideration but because of Covid ramping up again and low turnouts at previous forums, they have decided not to have another.”
So, the VOICE would be willing to support the Board in a Paneled Town Hall as well should you ask them to do so. And, I believe COVID would not be an issue if this was truly a question answering venue.
With all this support to help you sell your decisions, I would think you would take full advantage of it! It can only help you down the road when the Vote actually takes place.
I urge you to reconsider, as truly the best outcome is if everyone is convinced that it is the right thing to do when the ballot arrives, don’t you think?
Do you want some time to discuss or shall I assemble my list of questions for you?
Please advise!
No Reply
3rd attempt at Readdress emailed to the Board of Directors and Speak up on Monday, 8/23
Dear Board of Directors;
I am asking for a third time – please amend your motion on Wednesday to postpone voting on an OPTION and instead announce a last Town Hall paneled by you all, FRATF and any staff, so that we, as Property Owners, can ask all the relevant and pertinent questions that are so important now that you have declared your intentions at last week’s regular board meeting.
Would you please reconsider and do this for the sake of the Village?
No Reply
By Marcy G. Mermel, August 24, 2021
* * *
Thank you for reading. If you like, please comment below. We love to hear your opinion, but comments must be made using your first and last real name, or they will not be accepted. If you would like to submit an article for publication, please contact us through this website. Be sure to bookmark this website. Click here to visit the Hot Springs Village People Facebook Group.
Kathy Henderson Oram
08/24/2021 — 4:02 pm
They want everything their way and won’t even listen to other ideas. Where is the transparency? Thank you, Marcy, for trying.
Tom Blakeman
08/24/2021 — 4:37 pm
I think it should be pretty obvious to everybody. This “plan” is going forward for a vote. It has been going forward since the beginning. And, it doesn’t matter what any of us think. There is a timetable, ballots have most likely already been drafted and sent out for printing. The groundwork has already been laid for “vote and revote until the desired result is obtained”.
Marc Bayer
08/24/2021 — 5:20 pm
They have answered every comment and question I had.
My sense is they also gave that same opportunity to everyone.
It is their role and not the role of resigned or defeated former Board members to set the policy for the Village.
That is what they have been elected to do.
Mary Kennedy
08/24/2021 — 7:16 pm
That has also been my experience, Marc. That said, I didn’t try to micro-manage every decision – they’re doing what they were elected to do. They are “in charge”. I would not want a weak board that would bow to unreasonable demands. They are doing everything humanly possible to get this community on track to a stable future and are open/available to all constructive and respectful communication from property owners.
Erin Chavis
08/24/2021 — 6:07 pm
Thank you, Marcy, for your faithful efforts to bring to HSV a REASONABLE public discussion regarding the assessment vote. Though unsuccessful, it does show Tucker’s and the other BOD’s true TOTAL DISREGARD for the villagers’ concerns. I hope everyone will read your post and get to know the TRUE TUCKER who just seems to be another Nally in disguise and NOT the BOD member we all supported during his candidacy and election. Tucker, I think, wants to make HSV the rich people’s Paradise with such unnecessary amenities as the self loading trash truck and monthly assessments that will attract those who can readily afford the fees, no doubt, forcing some of the elderly long time residents from their homes. There is NOTHING TRANSPARENT about this BOD we elected. Wake up, Villagers, and let’s tell OUR BOD that we do not support this assessment increase that they are FORCING ON US. I wonder what hidden surprises the BOD has next for us!
Steven Smith
08/24/2021 — 7:08 pm
Thank you, a lot of people are disappointed in Tucker.
Mary Kennedy
08/24/2021 — 7:34 pm
My husband and I agreed to vote for Tucker, but not those who rode on the same promoted ticket and not because we particularly liked his platform. We believed he would be an asset to HSV because of his valuable experience with CCI and would bring diversity to the board. He did. We’ve heard him disagree and debate important issues in his honest way of communicating. He is a man who doesn’t compromise his integrity for anyone – not even those who post disrespectful and inappropriate comments on this thread. He’s the only candidate some of you supported who had the courage to stay the course as a board member and work for the good of this community. It’s heartbreaking to read such sniping comments made about such an honorable man.
Bob Medinger
08/25/2021 — 2:02 pm
I agree with you Mary. Tucker is a man of character who stepped up to serve HSV when he could be enjoying his retirement (and fairly recent marriage too). We are lucky he did! The facts and issues are known to all who have paid any attention. The costs at HSV are exceeding our revenue, and it needs to be addressed. The members of the FRATF (also volunteers) were knowledgeable and talented, and provided HSV owners with facts and solutions. Some people just want more venues to grandstand and complain about things that happened many years ago. Vote yes to strengthen the future of HSV!
Andy Turner
08/24/2021 — 7:57 pm
There are now black helicopters coming this way from Mena. They’re all out to get us!
HSVP C
08/24/2021 — 8:02 pm
Thank you, Andy, for warning us. Valuable input like yours is always welcome.
Walter Chance
08/24/2021 — 9:18 pm
Marc maybe a hire on for the lot owner association. Otherwise he is one Ill informed person who is buddies with the BODs. Either way he has the most baseless of arguments for asking reasonable questions. He is certainly not a lawyer and is most ignorant of past POA decisions
Marc S Bayer
08/25/2021 — 2:44 pm
Walt, are you really as arrogant as your Post indicates you to be. To me, you just sound like a self righteous know it all, who doesn’t know now from than. That’s your problem, buddy.
And for the record, I am a home owning resident and I do not know any director, but unlike you I live in the present.
Earl Fitzgerald
09/22/2021 — 8:35 pm
Marc, you are just as arrogant in your replies as well……
Amazing how quick you are with your tongue…
Kirk Denger
08/24/2021 — 11:04 pm
Slavery ended in America in the 19th century. In this 21st century the Property Owners have a vote but the master has 10 to each 1, Class A and Class B in HSVPOA Declarations, that we live under. Are we free? Or must we slave to work harder and give more for our master? The FRAT Force is controlled by our Developer. Your vote, your choice.
Marc Bayer
08/25/2021 — 9:01 am
Kirk, wouldn’t have been that way if it weren’t for the ego driven pandering by WTP in their ill conceived “SEND A MESSAGE” campaign a couple of years ago.
Wonder what their destructive message will be this time around.
Walter Chance
08/25/2021 — 4:21 pm
Marc, No not at all, but I see you have made yourself the know it all on this thread. Past performance of any organization is paramount in making decisions about the direction of the Village. You have not done your homework sir. The assessments we collect are less than the bloated payroll. And deferred maintaince from previous GMs and BODs led to this mess we are in. Throwing more money at it isn’t going to get us anywhere. I live in the present, and the POA in the present is a mess. Perhaps you should read the post from past threads or at least have an open mind when reading Marcy’s and Joe’s columns. If you took the time to educate yourself or read the financials, you may have a change of mind.
Jack McKinney
08/25/2021 — 8:21 pm
I agree with the assessment increase in principle. However the FRATF committee and the board
totally ignored the most important issue. The terrible 2-tier assessment decision headed by
Keith Keck several years ago has cost us an enormous amount of revenue loss. This error in
judgement should be corrected NOW.
The proposed assessment increases for residents should apply to all property owners. Non-resident property owners buy property to either build in the Village or speculate on an increase in property value. Both purchase reasons rely on the Village prospering.
GET RID OF THE TWO TIER ASSESSMENT differential. The Village will then truly prosper!
JACK MCKINNEY
08/25/2021 — 8:49 pm
The difference between Resident Property owners and non-resident property owners in the up-coming assessment vote
DATE 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
RESIDENT $90 $100 $110 $120 $125
NON- $42 $44 $46 $48 $49
RESIDENT
DIFFER $48 $56 $64 $72 $76
A BIG INCREASING DIFFERENCE.
LET’S SHAFT THE RESIDENT PROPERTY OWNERS
Resident $90 $100 $110 $120 $125
Non Resident $42 $44 $46 $48 $49
let’s shaft the resident property owners!
Difference $48 $56 $64 $72 $76
Janet Potter
08/29/2021 — 12:38 pm
Is there a plan to force owners of unimproved lots to build and reside in the Village? Why should permanent residents take the brunt of this increase, while they, the unimproved lot owners, get to enjoy the benefits?
Wes Smith
09/19/2021 — 3:40 pm
Marcy,
Thanks for your due diligence & perseverance!
I so regret you were not elected to the BOD to ensure parliamentary procedures are adhered to instead of these quasi BOD meetings!
Although, Tucker failed to follow thru with his reply to answer any questions after your second email this goes to character & integrity .
This is all intentional & a preview of coming attractions of further executive sessions that will surely follow to circumvent transparency!
Keep up the good fight at the town hall meetings
Wish I could be there .
Gina Katin
10/16/2021 — 12:11 pm
Just a visitor but shouldn’t everyone pay the same?